LETTER: Weapons are silly and useless

editorial image

Caroline Ansell proudly reports that she spoke in favour of the Trident renewal programme during last week’s Common’s debate – albeit to a near empty chamber. Leaving aside any moral questions, it would be interesting to learn of a credible situation in which our “independent” nuclear arsenal could be effective. No one dare suggest one for fear of ridicule.

It is not enough to say the future is uncertain. Of course it is – it is the future!

But that is an argument that could be used to justify any other expenditure let alone the staggering £40 Billion plus £2 Billion a year running costs of Trident. Why, given our membership of Nato does the UK need this horrendous ultimate weapon of mass destruction when all but a handful of the world’s nations survive without it.

Caroline talks about nuclear disarmament but tens of thousands of nuclear warheads remain. How can we preach nuclear non-proliferation to other nations when we will not surrender our own silly, useless but very expensive and unnecessary addition to the risk of nuclear accident.

Bob Giles

Midway Quay

Don’t miss out on all the latest breaking news where you live.

Here are four ways you can be sure you’ll be amongst the first to know what’s going on.

1) Make our website your homepage at www.eastbourneherald.co.uk/

2) Like our Facebook page at Text to display

3) Follow us on Twitter @Eastbournenews

4) Register with us by clicking on ‘sign in’ (top right corner). You can then receive our daily newsletter AND add your point of view to stories that you read here.

And do share with your family and friends - so they don’t miss out!

The Eastbourne Herald - always the first with your local news.

Be part of it.