Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Willingdon Golf Club
Sponsored by
Southdown Road, Eastbourne, East Sussex, BN20 9AA
Tel 01323 410981
 
 
Wednesday, 7th January 2009

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

Huge disappointment over incinerator decision



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 29 July 2008
A SEAFORD town councillor has spoken of his bitter disappointment after a bid by the Friends of the Earth to stop the controversial Newhaven waste incinerator failed in the High Court.
The incinerator project was put under the legal spotlight after the High Court granted an urgent hearing for a case filed by the Lewes District Friends of the Earth.

But the court ruled the planning process was sound.

Councillor Eddie Collict,
who is against the scheme, spoke after the decision was made last week.

Cllr Collict said, "I'm obviously disappointed.

"It shows that the legal system is not about justice but about law.
"How can it be right when there is widespread objection to it? It can't be right to force it on people."

While last week's hearing was going ahead campaigners made their feelings clear after several broke into the site of the proposed incinerator site at the North Quay, locking themselves to equipment and climbing the boom of the crane.

A total of 11 people have been charged with aggravated trespass and a 45-year-old woman arrested for allegedly causing an obstruction and assaulting police has been bailed.

Cllr Collict added that in the main most people had acted in a civil manner and praised those that had done so. He said, "I do think that it's a great credit to people that have fought this long.

"I think the strong feeling will continue.

"We are going to be landed with this thing for 30 odd years at least, we have to live with it for a length of time.

"Local people have been first class, the fact they failed is not a reflection on them but the stupidity of the county council."

Seaford MP Norman Baker added, "The law allows the county council to be judge and jury on its own application.

"The county council is railroading this through against the local population.

"It's not surprising, although I don't condone it, that some people have been protesting in the way they have."

Campaigners were victorious when the incinerator's pollution permit was quashed by the High Court last year in a separate legal challenge and remained hopeful that they would receive another positive outcome.

After the hearing Phil Michaels, head of legal at Friends of the Earth, said the organisation would be considering the court's judgement before deciding whether there were grounds to appeal.

East Sussex County Council said it was pleased with the outcome and would work with waste management company Veolia to continue with their plans to build the incinerator.

A spokesperson said, "We are very pleased with the result of the review of our planning procedures.

"We fully understand the concerns of people affected by this issue.

"Part of our job now is to reassure anyone who is worried that this is a safe and responsible option that will bring great benefits to the people of East Sussex, Brighton and Hove."

In a press release the council added that its priorities remain to reduce, reuse and recycle before energy recovery and landfill.



The full article contains 514 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 29 July 2008 4:47 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Eastbourne
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Michael Ryan,

Shrewsbury 31/07/2008 11:06:41
The incinerator proposed for Newhaven is not "Best Available Technique" for disposal of waste and it alos fails to comply with Article 4 of European Directive 2006/12/EC, as Veolia know very well from the Shrewsbury Chronicle article of 20 March 2008: "Dire warning on 'illegal' incinerator".

An earlier Shrewsbury Chronicle article reported Veolia's plasma gasification contract in Midland, Michigan, and Veolia's allegation that plasma gasification was unsuitable for municipal waste. That allegation is untrue, otherwise the City of Ottawa and other locations wouldn't be using plasma gasification which is the cheapest and safest system of waste disposal.

Kind regards,

Michael Ryan,
Shrewsbury
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.