Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Sussex Downs College
Sponsored by
Want to learn something new? Try a course at Sussex Downs Adult College. Call 0845 2 601 608.
 
 
Wednesday, 20th August 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

A259 the worst road in Sussex



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

AS the battle continues to stop the transfer of acute maternity service to Hastings, the route which would be faced by mums in labour has been branded the most dangerous in Sussex and fifth most dangerous in Britain.
The 19-mile stretch of the A259 from Eastbourne to Hastings has the highest proportion of accidents in the south east, according to a list compiled by EuroRAP for the ITV programme Police, Camera, Action.

It had 47 fatal and serious collisions bet
ween 2004 and 2006 and has been rated as medium-high risk by EuroRAP.

In February 27-year-old Abrar Ahmed Khan, of Crawley, was killed on the road after a three car pile up at Hooe. Pevensey Bay motorcyclist Glyn Jenkins, 23, also lost his life when he collided with traffic lights on the A259, near Eastbourne Marina, in December.

Eastbourne MP Nigel Waterson said, "I am surprised the A27 didn't get the top prize but no-one needed to tell us the A259 is a very dangerous road and a very congested road.

"That is one of the main reasons we are campaigning so hard to keep full maternity services in Eastbourne.

"My concern is for mums in the back of ambulances."

Mr Waterson said he had experienced the A259 first hand and added, "It is a dangerous road because it is not up to modern motoring demands which means people end up taking risks."

EuroRAP's results state 30 per cent of Britain's primary roads fail to rate as safe and extra funding would save lives.

A spokesperson for the Highways Agency said, "We have carried out some work on the A259 in recent years specifically addressing safety.

"We have done resurfacing in certain areas and installed skid resistant surfaces.

"On the A259 only a small proportion of accidents are caused by the infrastructure of the road and we are working with our road safety partners, like Sussex Police, to educate drivers on how they can play their part in keeping the road safe."

This part of the A259 was also slammed in May when it was put in the top ten most difficult routes in the country, according to a poll carried out on behalf of Airwaves chewing gum.

That survey was completed by 3,612 adults and 74 per cent of drivers who gave the A259 a black mark did so because of the daily volume of traffic.

It was also found that 68 per cent of drivers think the road is badly maintained and 66 per cent said the behaviour of other drivers made it one of the most 'challenging' routes to travel.

At the time, save the DGH campaign leader Liz Walke agreed with Mr Waterson and said the A259 would put lives in 'severe danger' if Eastbourne's nearest maternity unit was in Hastings.



The full article contains 476 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 01 July 2008 5:37 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Eastbourne
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Martin Cassini,

Devon 02/07/2008 23:00:26
Sorry, I don't know the actual location, but usually lights are a rearguard attempt to solve problems caused by main road priority, which makes roads dangerous in the first place. To interrupt the priority streams of traffic so that others can cross in relative, but not guaranteed safety, lights are "needed". Remove priority and you remove the "need" for lights and the need for speed. Then people can use commonsense to approach junctions slowly, and common courtesy to filter in turn. What could be more civilised or efficient as a form of junction control? If policymakers harnessed human nature instead of hampering it, they would see most of our road safety and congestion problems disappear. More at www.fitroads.org
2

Ashley Leaney,

Uckfield 03/07/2008 12:06:10
Mr Cassini raises an interesting point that warrants further discussion - BUT:

The key phrases her are:

"It is a dangerous road because it is not up to modern motoring demands which means PEOPLE END UP TAKING RISKS."

"On the A259 only a small proportion of accidents are caused by the infrastructure of the road"

If the road is dangerous then drivers should drive accordingly - SLOW DOWN!

Infrastructure does not 'jump out' in front of vehicles; vehicles collide with road furniture usually as a result of driver error - often (usually) excess speed.

Mr Jenkins will have collided with the traffic lights for a reason - either his own or someone else's error.

Yes, of course roads should be improved wherever possible but - ROADS DO NOT CAUSE 'ACCIDENTS' - people do.

I for one do not want a 4 lane dual carriageway on the route of the A259. It is a busy, narrow road - SLOW DOWN AND DRIVE ACCORDINGLY.
3

Martin Cassini,

UK 07/07/2008 08:49:48
True, the road itself can't cause accidents, and the only way to achieve zero road accidents is to prohibit people from leaving home. But traffic engineers can and should design roads in a human-scale way to encourage civilised interaction. But they don't. Road design is largely alien to human nature. The priority given to main roads says, "I own this road. Side road traffic can look out for itself." Thus traffic trying to get out of a T-junction, for example, is faced with indefinite delay and multiple conflict points - fast traffic from both sides. That traffic is licensed to plough on and ignore their needs of others, even if they were there first. Accidents are not accidents at all. They are events contrived by the rules of the road. So what do the "experts" do? At vast expense, they put up lights to interrupt the priority traffic streams so that others can cross. They make us stop so we avoid the inconvenience of slowing down. Brilliant! - Instead of all that waste of life, time and fuel, road design should embrace human skill and context, and allow filter in turn, which happens naturally when we are free of counterproductive controls. More at www.fitroads.org
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 

Today's Vote

Do you agree with the headmaster of Eastbourne College that exam league tables no longer serve a useful purpose?
Yes
No

Featured Advertising



Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.