Help Sitemap Home Skip Navigation Contact Us Disability Statement

Sussex Downs College
Sponsored by
Want to learn something new? Try a course at Sussex Downs Adult College. Call 0845 2 601 608.
 
 
Monday, 6th October 2008

Premium Article !

Your account has been frozen. For your available options click the below button.

Options

Premium Article !

To read this article in full you must have registered and have a Premium Content Subscription with the n/a site.

Subscribe

Registered Article !

To read this article in full you must be registered with the site.

1,000 sign up against parking scheme



Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image
Click on thumbnail to view image

Published Date: 09 May 2008
MORE than 1,000 residents have put their names to a petition calling for the controversial pay to park scheme to be dropped.
Liberal Democrats in Eastbourne, who are vehemently opposed to motorists being charged to park in the town centre and along the seafront, say residents have been snapping up their postcard petition.
Stephen Lloyd, the Lib Dem's parliamentary candidate, said, "It's clear that the vast majority of people in Eastbourne still support our battle against the county council.
"I've already received more than a thousand responses saying a very clear No to Pay to Park, with more petitions coming in each day.
"East Sussex County Council is still trying to railroad its expensive and unwanted scheme on to the people of Eastbourne and now wasting more taxpayers' money by undertaking yet another consultation.
"We will pass all our petitions to the county council, but I would urge all those people who wrote to me to also send their objections to the county council, Ref D3-MV, FREEPOST, LW43, Lewes, East Sussex BN7 1BR. Even at this late stage I still hold out hope that County Hall will see sense.
"The longer they persist the harder it is becoming for local residents and businesses in Eastbourne. Why is it that PCSOs are able to ticket illegally parked cars in Bexhill and around Hastings but not in Eastbourne?
"I hold up my hand to the fact that, like most people in Eastbourne, on occasions I've parked illegally but I would be more than happy to support PCSOs doing a regular blitz on illegal parking and would welcome an opportunity to pay a fine.
"We do not want the Pay to Park scheme imposed on Eastbourne. It's already cost local people £1million and if it does go ahead, will cost us all at least £2million per year.
"If the consequences of what has happened to independent traders in Lewes and Rother is anything to go by, once a scheme like this is introduced business drops off sharply, the zones spread and year on year the charges go up."

The full article contains 354 words and appears in n/a newspaper.
Page 1 of 1

  • Last Updated: 12 May 2008 5:09 PM
  • Source: n/a
  • Location: Eastbourne
 
Prev
1
Next
1

Keith King,

Eastbourne 12/05/2008 09:49:21
No doubt the 1000 people who signed the petition are the 1000 people who park on double yellow lines, disabled bays, loading bays and park all day in the two hour parking bays.
2

Veracity,

Heathfield 12/05/2008 20:37:33
At Last! The people of Eastbourne are waking up to the fact that if you don't shout loud and long the politicians will walk all over you in their quest for dosh to waste!
3

GB North Harbour,

12/05/2008 23:47:27
The police have already said they do not want to tie up PCSOs ticketing cars. If the borough council do not want pay to park are they going to pay for Traffic Wardens?. Im not sure what Mr LIoyd means by 'consequences of what has happened to independent traders in Lewes'. I went to Lewes this weekend, its seems to be a thriving town with great shops. I parked in East street car park on Saturday, and paid £1 for 2 hours, thats less than you pay at the Arndale centre. Eastbourne seems to have two types of shops, charity and empty
4

Andys,

13/05/2008 07:36:56
1000? That leaves 90,000+ residents who presumable are happy or ambivolent about the scheme.

Looks like a very vocal but extremely small minority against the plans to me.

I have to agree with GB North Harbour - Brighton, Hove, Lewes all appear to be thriving despite the parking charges.
5

trojan,

Eastbourne 13/05/2008 09:42:36
It might only be 1000 but where are the 1000s who are for this scheme? Are they equally happy or ambivolent?

Eastbourne will suffer from this scheme as Lewes does. People will pay Brighton rates for the Brighton range of shops. Neither Lewes or Eastbourne have that range and will lose out.
Traffic management is dreadful in Lewes with lorries and vans daily reducing the high street to a single lane.
The residents proved their dislike for the scheme by destroying the ticket machines.
What benefit could the scheme bring that proper policing of illegal parking cannot do and at a greatly reduced cost?
6

Veracity,

Heathfield 13/05/2008 10:20:33
The 90000 are not happy or ambivalent. They are the apathetic individuals who will only start bleating when pay to park comes into force. As for Lewes, just ask the Chamber of Commerce what effect it has had! Even Brighton traders would fare much better if it didn't cost a fortune to park there. The Eastbourne traders will soon start whinging if this daylight robbery is allowed to come into force! All Eastbourne needs is for the present legislation to be enforced by half a dozen wardens paid for by the Borough and County councils. Not the multi million pound overkill that County propose and have jumped the gun to try and implement!
7

GB North Harbour,

13/05/2008 13:58:33
Personally I dont want my council tax going up even further to pay for traffic wardens. The county council will not pay for them so that leaves Eastbourne council tax payers left with the bill.
I notice Veracity is in Heathfield so will not have to contribute to the extra cost.
8

Veracity,

Heathfield 13/05/2008 19:08:35
Veracity is interested because she who is adored has been making noises for some time re moving to Eastbourne!
Prev
1
Next

 

Comment on this Story

 

In order to post comments you must Register or Sign In

 
 
 
  

 
 


Sister Newspapers:
Press Complaints Commission

This website and its associated newspaper adheres to the Press Complaints Commission’s Code of Practice. If you have a complaint about editorial content which relates to inaccuracy or intrusion, then contact the Editor by clicking here.

If you remain dissatisfied with the response provided then you can contact the PCC by clicking here.